EMANCIPATORY POTENTIALS OF WORKSHOP CULTURE
This issue was produced in collaboration with Kai van Eikels, a researcher in the performing arts, who in 2021 co-organised the conference “Workshop: Research into the Art-Political Format” together with Stefan Hölscher and the Institute for Critical Inquiries (ICI) in Berlin. The issue publishes a selection of texts presented at the conference, arranged in a way that enables a polemical reading.
Contemporary dance workshops in the Slovenian context perform an important educational function, as this field remains relatively weakly institutionalised. At the same time, they contribute to the popularisation of dance, the development of amateur culture, and the connection between theory and practice. The conference topic therefore proves crucial for reflecting on the Slovenian contemporary dance scene: on the one hand its precarity, and on the other its potential to produce different forms of sociability — which can also be understood as two sides of the same coin. Maintaining spaces in which activity is not governed solely by the logic of profit and the imperative of the final product enables experimentation with new social situations and relations, while at the same time raising questions about the precarity of work and relationships.
MASKA Performing Arts Journal
Vol. XLI, no. 231—232 (Spring 2026)
Editor-in-chief: Jaka Bombač
Guest co-editor: Kai van Eikels
Published by: Maska, Institute for Publishing, Production and Education
Design and Layout: Niko Lapkovski
As many authors in this issue point out, tension is already inscribed in the very concept of the workshop. The English term workshop combines the meanings of work and commerce, and historically moves from craft-based production toward political and pedagogical practices. As Kai van Eikels emphasises in the introductory historical overview, the term originally referred to a site of manufactural production, and only towards the end of the 19th century did it acquire more explicit political dimensions in the context of liberation movements. In the contemporary post-Fordist economy, linked to the knowledge economy and immaterial labour, the workshop increasingly no longer denotes a site of production but rather a site of experience, learning, and consumption.
Within this cultural-historical framework, the various transformations of the workshop format reveal two parallel tendencies (politicisation and marketisation) which converge in the countercultural movements of the 1960s. At that time, workshops became spaces of collective practice, non-hierarchical learning, and experimentation with social forms beyond established institutional frameworks. At the same time, some contemporary critics argue that their emphasis on individual liberation contributed to the later psychologisation and expansion of the so-called self-help industry.
The contributions in this issue address this tension from different perspectives. Bojana Cvejić highlights the emancipatory potential of contemporary workshop culture and theorises it through the concept of “transindividuation”, while Sabeth Buchmann draws attention to the links between workshop practices, cybernetic thinking, and logics of self-regulation. Konstantina Georgelou analyses workshops in the context of arts education, where they often intersect with mechanisms of selection and unpaid labour, and Anne Schuh examines the format of sharing practices, which seeks to establish more egalitarian forms of exchange while simultaneously raising questions about implicit norms and criteria.
In a conversation with Kai van Eikels, artist Aernout Mik problematises the intertwining of workshop, corporate, and religious cultures, highlighting their shared embeddedness in the production of collective affectivity. His installation Speaking in tongues points to the ambivalence of such formats, which can simultaneously enable communal experiences and reproduce individualised forms of participation. Perhaps, however, collective forms of participation are enabled by shared aesthetic contexts, as suggested by the authors of a collective critical contribution developed under the mentorship of Bojana Cvejić at last year’s contemporary dance biennial Gibanica. As one of the authors writes, it was possible, based on the performances seen, to discern that younger creators “do not operate with a shared aesthetic framework that would support them in experimenting with expressive forms and tools through which they could address their generation”.
A special place in the issue is also occupied by conversations and reflective texts by artists that illuminate the workshop as a space of artistic experience. In the dialogue between Xavier Le Roy and Yvonne Rainer, generational differences and diverse contexts of workshop practice are revealed, while Diedrich Diederichsen, through personal memories of his first music workshop in the 1980s in West Berlin, reflects on the relationship between following instructions and one’s own impulses in an improvisational context.
I hope this issue will contribute to a broader discussion on the role of workshops in contemporary dance and also open up questions about precarious working conditions and the changing understanding of work more broadly. Contemporary dance can ultimately be understood as a society in miniature — a space where social relations are not only reflected but actively questioned and reshaped through shared bodily practice.
Jaka Bombač
Table of Contents
KAI VAN EIKELS
Where, if Not in a Workshop? On the Politics and Economics of Practicing Infrastructure
BOJANA CVEJIĆ
Scores, Feelings: Or Whence Workshops Transindividuate
SABETH BUCHMANN
Working On/In Workshops
KONSTANTINA GEORGELOU
Postwork Imaginaries: The Workshop in Art Education
ANNE SCHUH
Sharing Practice, Formatting Dance
DIEDRICH DIEDERICHSEN
Growing Up in Musical Workshops: Giving in to Momentary Urges
XAVIER LE ROY in YVONNE RAINER
How Do You Come Into the Situation Then?
AERNOUT MIK in KAI VAN EIKELS
Business Workshops and the Holy Ghost
ANA LETUNIĆ, ANA PINTER, ELENA NOVAKOVITS, GREGOR SIROTIĆ MARUŠIĆ, IGOR BURIĆ, KAROLINA BUGAJAK, MARINA SRNKA, NEFELI GIOTI
Meandering Critically Through Gibanica: Notes from a Critique Workshop